Thursday, January 4, 2018

St. Thomas Aquinas in Education


Who is St. Thomas Aquinas?
He is an Italian philosopher, theologian, and Dominican friar whose works have made him the most important figure in Scholastic philosophy and one of the leading Roman Catholic theologians.

The Life of St. Thomas Aquinas
        Thomas Aquinas was born on 1225 in the castle of Roccasecca.
        He was the scion of Count Landulph of Aquino and Countess Theodora of Theate.
        He was educated at Monte Cassino and then the University of Naples.
        He became a Dominican over the protests of his family.
        He eventually went north to study at Paris.
        Then he went to Cologne and studied with St. Albert the Great, whose interest in Aristotle strengthened his own predilections.
        He completed his studies in Paris, became a Master and for three years occupied one of the Dominican chairs in the Faculty of Theology.
        The next ten years were spent in various places in Italy, with the mobile papal court, at various Dominican houses, and eventually in Rome.
        From Rome he was called back to Paris to confront the controversy variously called Latin Averroism and Heterodox Aristotelianism. After this second three year stint, he was assigned to Naples.
        In 1274, on his way to the Council of Lyon, he fell ill and died on March 7 in the Cistercian abbey at Fossanova, which is perhaps twenty kilometers from Roccasecca.

His Battle Against Averroism
Averroism is a Medieval school of philosophy that  begun in the late 13th Century, based on the works of the 12th Century Arab philosopher Averroës (Ibn Rushd) and his interpretations of Aristotle and his reconciliation of Aristotelianism with the Islamic faith.
The movement, which can be considered a type of Scholasticism, is sometimes also known as Radical Aristotelianism or Heterodox Aristotelianism. The term "Averroism" itself was coined as late as the 19th Century.
The main ideas of the philosophical concept of Averroism include:
        there is one truth, but there are (at least) two ways to reach it, through philosophy and through religion;
        the world is eternal;
        the soul is divided into two parts, one individual, and one divine;
        the individual soul is not eternal;
        all humans at the basic level share one and the same divine soul (an idea known as monopsychism);
        resurrection of the dead is not possible (this was put forth by Boetius)

St. Thomas’s Education
Monte Cassino
-  Is a Monastic School that is one of the principal conduits of the liberal arts
-        Focuses on the arts of the trivium (grammar, rhetoric, logic) and arts of the quadrivium (arithmetic, geometry, music and astronomy)
-        These constituted the secular education complemented with sacred doctrine as learned from the Bible.
University of Naples
-        His education in the arts continued.
-        Here it would have been impressed upon him that the liberal arts were no longer adequate categories of secular learning: the new translations of Aristotle spelled the end of the liberal arts tradition, although the universities effected a transition rather than a breach.
University of Paris
        His college education began here as the superiors of the Dominican Order sent him here. Paris was then the intellectual center of Christendom.
Studium generale of Dominicans in Cologne
        There he studied from 1248 to 1252 with St. Albert the Great, who was named Doctor Universalis in the Middle Ages because of his wide ranging scholarly interests.
University of Paris
        Aquinas returned to the University of Paris (1252-1256) to complete his theological training.
        The secular masters of the university refused to admit Aquinas, as well as his Franciscan colleague Bonaventure, as a master. Only through papal intervention was their resistance brought to an end.
The Medieval University: An Analysis
        Faculty of Arts provided the point of entry to teen-aged boys. The faculty is modeled on the guilds where the student served a long apprenticeship, established his competence in stages, and eventually after a public examination was named a master and then gave his inaugural lecture.
        With the attainment of the Master of Arts at about the age of 20, one could go on to study in a higher faculty, law, medicine or theology.

St. Thomas’s Writings
        Commentary on the Sentences
        On Being and Essence
        The Principles of Nature
        On the Trinity
        De hebdomadibus
        Summa contra gentiles
        De Anima
        Summa theologiae

Theologian or Philosopher?
Many contemporary philosophers are unsure how to read St. Thomas. He was in his primary and official profession a theologian. Nonetheless, we find among his writings works anyone would recognize as philosophical and the dozen commentaries on Aristotle increasingly enjoy the respect and interest of Aristotelian scholars. Even within theological works as such there are extended discussions that are easily read as possessing a philosophical character.

“… the believer and the philosopher consider creatures differently. The philosopher considers what belongs to their proper natures, while the believer considers only what is true of creatures insofar as they are related to God, for example, that they are created by God and are subject to him, and the like.” (Summa contra gentiles, bk II, chap. 4)
“… it should be noted that different ways of knowing (ratio cognoscibilis) give us different sciences. The astronomer and the natural philosopher both conclude that the earth is round, but the astronomer does this through a mathematical middle that is abstracted from matter, whereas the natural philosopher considers a middle lodged in matter. Thus there is nothing to prevent another science from treating in the light of divine revelation what the philosophical disciplines treat as knowable in the light of human reason.” (Summa theologiae, Ia.1.1 ad 2)

The presuppositions of the philosopher, that to which his discussions and arguments are ultimately driven back, are in the public domain, as it were. They are things that everyone in principle can know upon reflection; they are where disagreement between us must come to an end. These principles are not themselves the products of deductive proof—which does not of course mean that they are immune to rational analysis and inquiry—and thus they are said to be known by themselves (per se, as opposed to per alia).
Theological discourse and inquiry look like any other and is, needless to say, governed by the common principles of thought and being; but it is characterized formally by the fact that its arguments and analyses are taken to be truth-bearing only for one who accepts Scriptural revelation as true.

The Theology of St. Thomas
Faith and reason are the two primary tools which are both necessary in obtaining a true knowledge of God.
He believed that God reveals himself through nature, so that rational thinking and the study of nature is also the study of God (a blend of Aristotelian Greek philosophy with Christian doctrine).
From his consideration of what God is not, Aquinas proposed five positive statements about the divine qualities or the nature of God:
        God is simple, without composition of parts, such as body and soul, or matter and form.
        God is perfect, lacking nothing.
        God is infinite, and not limited in the ways that created beings are physically, intellectually, and emotionally limited.
        God is immutable, incapable of change in respect of essence and character.
        God is one, such that God's essence is the same as God's existence.
Aquinas believed that the existence of God is neither self-evident nor beyond proof. In the Summa Theologica, he details five rational proofs for the existence of God, the quinquae viae or the Five Ways:
        Argument of the unmoved mover (ex motu) -everything that is moved is moved by a mover, therefore there is an unmoved mover from whom all motion proceeds, which is God.
        Argument of the first cause (ex causa) - everything that is caused is caused by something else, therefore there must be an uncaused cause of all caused things, which is God.
        Argument from contingency (ex contingentia) - there are contingent beings in the universe which may either exist or not exist and, as it is impossible for everything in the universe to be contingent (as something cannot come of nothing), so there must be a necessary being whose existence is not contingent on any other being, which is God.
        Argument from degree (ex gradu) - there are various degrees of perfection which may be found throughout the universe, so there must be a pinnacle of perfection from which lesser degrees of perfection derive, which is God.
        Teleological argument (ex fine) - all natural bodies in the world (which are in themselves unintelligent) act towards ends (which is characteristic of intelligence), therefore there must be an intelligent being that guides all natural bodies towards their ends, which is God.
St. Thomas believed that Jesus Christ was truly divine and not simply a human being or God merely inhabiting the body of Christ. However, he held that Christ had a truly rational human soul as well, producing a duality of natures that persisted even after the Incarnation, and that these two natures existed simultaneously yet distinguishably in one real human body.

St. Thomas’ Philosophy
Philosophical thinking is characterized by its argumentative structure and a science is taken to be principally the discovery of the properties of kinds of things.

Like Aristotle, St. Thomas holds that there is a plurality of both theoretical and practical sciences.
        The practical use of the mind has as its object the guidance of some activity other than thinking.
e.g. Ethics, economics and politics
        The theoretical use of the mind has truth as its object. It seeks not to change the world but to understand it.
e.g. physics, mathematics and metaphysics

Another way to philosophical inquiry has something to do with the appropriate order in which it should be studied. That order of learning is as follows:
  1. Logic. The primacy of logic in this order stems from the fact that we have to know what knowledge is so we will recognize that we have met its demands in a particular case.
  2. Mathematics. The study of mathematics comes early because little experience of the world is required to master it.
  3. Natural philosophy. Knowledge of the physical world requires an ever increasing dependence upon a wide and deep experience of things.
  4. Moral philosophy. This requires not only experience, but good upbringing and the ordering of the passions.
  5. Metaphysics. Speculative wisdom is the culminating and defining goal of philosophical inquiry: it is such knowledge as we can achieve of the divine, the first cause of all else.

St. Thomas and Education
For Aquinas, teaching is connected with the Divine, since he argues that though human beings are able to teach, they do so in a secondary sense and that it is God who primarily teaches. This is because God is the source of all being and is the light at the heart of our being.

In the learning process, a key feature of Aquinas’s account builds on the nature of illumination, which is to say an understanding of what is taught that enables us to see how what we have learnt connects to other things.
Ultimately, these connections lead us to Wisdom, which is to say God, and for Aquinas wisdom in its different forms is the central aim of all teaching and learning.

Although Aquinas does not develop a treatise on teaching and learning, he spent a considerable amount of his time teaching and throughout his writings there are references to teaching and to learning.
He deals explicitly with teaching and learning in a number of his works:
        De Veritate , question 11;
        Summa Theologica , prima pars , question 117
        II Sentences, questions 9 and 28

“Education has, and hence teaching and learning have, an unambiguous theological goal, namely, God, who is wisdom and truth.”

“The ultimate end of the whole universe is Truth and this is also the aim of the wise.”

Recognition of the teacher as a role model for the pupil
Love and enthusiasm for the subject, while crucial to teaching, are not enough; the teacher must also genuinely care for the truth and be committed to possessing a mastery of his or her subject.
Faith is required not just for religious belief, but for scientific understanding as well, for as Aquinas says, we could not live in the world at all unless we are prepared to have faith.
       The emphasis on trust and faith in teaching and learning in particular highlights the importance of the relationship between the teacher and the learner.
Teacher and learner are both engaged in a voyage of discovery for the truth.
       A poor or distant relationship will not facilitate learning, since it will not promote the trust required for the pupil to have confidence in the teacher.

Passages from Aquinas:

“Man can truly be called a true teacher in as much as he teaches the truth and enlightens the mind. This does not mean, however, that he endows the mind with light, but that, as it were, he co-operates with the light of reason by supplying external help to it to reach the perfection of knowledge.
                                                 – Quaestiones De Veritate, 11
“Man, teaching from without, does not infuse the intelligible light, but he is in a certain sense a cause of the intelligible species, in so far as he offers us certain signs of intelligible likenesses, which our understanding receives from those signs and keeps within itself.
                                                 – Quaestiones De Veritate, 11
“Knowledge, therefore, pre-exists in the learner potentially, not, however, in the purely passive, but in the active, sense. Otherwise, man would not be able to acquire knowledge independently. Therefore, as there are two ways of being cured, that is, either through the activity of unaided nature or by nature with the aid of medicine, so also there are two ways of acquiring knowledge. In one way, natural reason by itself reaches knowledge of unknown things, and this way is called discovery; in the other way, when someone else aids the learner’s natural reason, and this is called learning by instruction.”
                                                             – Quaestiones De Veritate, 11 


Friday, November 1, 2013

Movie Review: “Mga Munting Tinig”

By: Noedy D. Balasa

SYNOPSIS

Mga Munting Tinig is an award-winning Philippine film about a young small-town teacher which is directed and produced by Gil Portes. It was filmed on location in Quezon Province with the Filipino actresses Alessandra de Rossi, Gina Alajar, Amy Austria, and Dexter Doria. The screenplay was also written by Gil Portes with Adolfo Alix, Jr. The film has received acclaim from critics both locally and internationally.

Melinda (Alessandra del Rossi) is a new substitute teacher at the Malawig Elementary School, located in a poor remote barrio. As a young university graduate from the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, her family expects her to look for work abroad, but in her idealism she takes on a challenging job in the provincial public school, which lacks resources and has corrupt personnel. The heavy monsoon rains and the nearby NPAs also add to her difficulties.

The children are indifferent to their studies, having been affected by the hopelessness around them. Melinda tries to motivate them by capitalizing on their interest and talent in singing. She takes advantage of a funding opportunity to enter them in a choral contest. She encounters some resistance, however, from the school administration and from the parents of her students. Furthermore, the death of one of the choral group’s members at the hands of the NPA casts a pall on their once joyful preparations. Melinda, however, constantly tries to rise above these challenges.

MORAL LESSONS


1. Every person has the right to dream and have their own ambition in life which they will seek to fulfill in the course of their life through the use of their talents.

2. Everyone has the right to dream and make goals in life. It cannot be hindered by anyone because we always have the power to make them come true. And you should not listen to someone that is putting you down; so that you would succeed and be able to do anything you want. We are all people living in this big world, and so, we have the right to soar high in life

3. Even though you start small, as long as you have the people you love with you, you will be successful. If, there will be trials then you must work together to pull through.

4. Teamwork is one of the best ways to accomplish a hard task. When some members in a group does not help, there could be some problems and will waste the precious time that was given to you.

5. Problems that we encounter should not hinder us from doing our task rather it should motivate us and make us stronger each and every day that we look ahead to our goals.

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Behavioral Engineering in Classroom Management



A Reflection Paper

By: Noedy D. Balasa



 To the Professional Reading of:

“Contingency Management in the Classroom”

Written By: B. F. Skinner














An Introduction of the Writer

          B. F. Skinner (1904-1990), is an American psychologist. Burrhus Frederic Skinner was born in Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, and educated at Harvard University, where he received (1931) a Ph.D. degree. He joined the Harvard faculty in 1948. Skinner became the foremost exponent in the U.S. of the behaviorist school of psychology, in which human behavior is explained in terms of physiological responses to external stimuli. He also originated programmed instruction, a teaching technique in which the student is presented a series of ordered, discrete bits of information, each of which he or she must understand before proceeding to the next stage in the series.

            A variety of teaching machines have been designed that incorporate the ideas of Skinner. Among his important works are Behavior of Organisms (1938), Walden Two (1948), and The Technology of Teaching (1968). In Beyond Freedom and Dignity (1971), Skinner advocated mass conditioning as a means of social control. Later works include Particulars of My Life (1976) and Reflections on Behaviorism and Society (1978).


An Overview of the Literary Piece
            This piece that I have reviewed is entitled, “Contingency Management in the Classroom” was a speech delivered by B. F. Skinner at Western Washington State College on October 2, 1969 in connection with the dedication of Miller Hall. It was prepared with the help of a Career Award from the National Institutes of Mental Health.
            B. F. Skinner in his speech asserts the importance of the reason behind education. He asks what drives students to go to school. In due course he stresses on determining which is more effective in classroom management: the punitive method or the permissive approach. Delving further he emphasizes the importance of understanding operant behavior, the use of reinforcement and contingencies of reinforcement to make the students learn. With the development of this topic he also capitulates between the lines the foundations of effective teaching as to the three levels of effectivity: the school, teacher and student level factors.
Though Skinner did not mention these things verbatim the point is still made for present and future teachers. He uses terms often used in psychology throughout his speech but he makes the listeners and readers understand these words by the use of synonyms, illustrating examples and analysis of information. The speech is in essay form that revolves in a core idea: classroom management.
The piece is sensitive to the social issues of his time whereby he relates the news of his time to the occurrences in history. He makes concrete explanations of abstract ideas through the effective use of the most stirring social issues that goes along the tip of his main idea.
Thorough discussion is evident in this literary work but it has been quite observed that the manner of exposition is quite not chronologically arranged. The author starts with a discussion of the driving force behind education and he progresses into the topic of classroom management which is quite not clearly linked to his introduction. Some technical terms present can also be confusing and boring. All I all the work is excellent!

The Core Ideas Presented
“We are on the verge of a new educational method—a new pedagogy—in which the teacher will emerge as a skilled behavioral engineer.”
            Skinner views the modern teacher, you and me, too be well versed in the arts and science of molding students through the use of psychology. He says that a would-be teacher should have the chance to see learning take place or produce visible learning himself. Saying this he became a patron of John Dewey’s principle evident in teacher training today as the Experiential Learning or Field Study Courses.
             We teachers should inculcate the value of basic psychology into our profession because the new method has abandoned the traditional ways and is becoming more progressive through the passing of years.
            “Education is primarily concerned with the transmission of a culture…the classroom is a community with a culture of its own…the sooner we find effective means of social control, the sooner we shall produce a culture in which man’s potential is fully realized.”
            The teacher is undoubtedly charged with the most critical burden in a society: the transmission of culture. The teacher should ask himself then:
1.      What culture will I transmit to my students?
2.      What good will he/she learn from this culture?
3.      What fruits will this culture bear?
A teacher who shows absenteeism transmits a culture of tardiness and absenteeism. The child will be inefficient and teaching will be made useless while the child’s culture will destabilize his future and that of his nation; getting fired from work he becomes a social burden that topples the economy. A teacher who shows bad deeds transmits corrupt culture and destroys morality while a well mannered teacher invests on a glorious culture that brings about social development.
The classroom is a community. It is the image of our society as a whole. What we see in classrooms are the small-scale of our society. What students see in a society is mirrored to the classroom while what they show in their classrooms today will be their attitudes tomorrow. Corrupt the classroom culture and you destroy the society. Build a moral classroom environment and make the society better.
Skinner believes that man’s potential can only be fully realized in a society that has a culture of social control and so do I. If we have means to make people stop doing immoral acts at a wide scale social dimension then we can create a society where man becomes fully effective and efficient since he will have no worries.
“Sow a thought and reap an act;
Sow an act and reap a habit;
Sow a habit and reap a character;
Sow a character and reap a destiny.”

The Means to Achieving Our Goals
            Skinner believes that a “driving force” is necessary to make students learn inside the classroom. He says that in the traditional scenario this “driving force” is present in the form of punitive methods while in the permissive scenario this “driving force” is present in the form of either stressing the long-term advantages of education or bringing a real life situation in the classroom. He further asserts that these measures fail because these are not enough in giving students the drive to study and learn.
            Effective and efficient teaching conducts a valid transfer of learning. To achieve this, Skinner asserts the use of operant behavior. The principle of operant behavior indicates that human behavior consists of emitted responses which are voluntary in nature and learning amounts to the change in operant rate through the use of reinforcements. Reinforcements are stimulus that strengthens the behavior which it is made contingent. To apply operant behavior effectively in a classroom this should be implemented in the three levels of building effective schools.

What should be done in the three levels of building effective schools?
       I.            School Level Factors
In this level there should be a guaranteed and viable curriculum that exhibits a good program of instruction and well defined behavioral objectives from the three domains of learning.
It is to be remembered always that a good program, according to B. F. Skinner:
·         Shapes new forms of behavior under the control of the right stimuli
·         Holds the student’s attention
·         Contains its own drive and reasons for learning (clarified through its objectives)
·         Clarifies the progress based on a set of standards
·         Is definite in size
·         Makes the student think and work right

    II.            Teacher Level Factors
In this level the multifunctional teacher should come to life. The effective teacher should rise to show his efficiency and professionalism. He should assume the various roles that he has inside the classroom. Among these are being the source and channel of learning, the examiner, the parent, and the governor of the classroom community.

 III.            Student Level Factors
In the student level factor it should be remembered that the students is a child or teenager that has some interests in some things that can be used as reinforcements. What drives learning into him is good interaction with the teacher and his peers together with a comfortable classroom environment.

Where am I in this picture?
            I am a student teacher and if I want to pursue the path to becoming a teacher I should do all it takes to learn as much as I can in this exposure to the field for B. F. Skinner says, “Everyone who intends to be a teacher should have the chance to see learning take place or produce visible learning himself.” This is my chance I should try to witness this path he says.
            For I also believe in what Aristotle have said, “what we have to learn to do, we learn by doing.” Ron Sebring also said, “Learn from other people’s mistakes because you won’t live long enough to make them all yourself.”