Thursday, January 4, 2018

St. Thomas Aquinas in Education


Who is St. Thomas Aquinas?
He is an Italian philosopher, theologian, and Dominican friar whose works have made him the most important figure in Scholastic philosophy and one of the leading Roman Catholic theologians.

The Life of St. Thomas Aquinas
        Thomas Aquinas was born on 1225 in the castle of Roccasecca.
        He was the scion of Count Landulph of Aquino and Countess Theodora of Theate.
        He was educated at Monte Cassino and then the University of Naples.
        He became a Dominican over the protests of his family.
        He eventually went north to study at Paris.
        Then he went to Cologne and studied with St. Albert the Great, whose interest in Aristotle strengthened his own predilections.
        He completed his studies in Paris, became a Master and for three years occupied one of the Dominican chairs in the Faculty of Theology.
        The next ten years were spent in various places in Italy, with the mobile papal court, at various Dominican houses, and eventually in Rome.
        From Rome he was called back to Paris to confront the controversy variously called Latin Averroism and Heterodox Aristotelianism. After this second three year stint, he was assigned to Naples.
        In 1274, on his way to the Council of Lyon, he fell ill and died on March 7 in the Cistercian abbey at Fossanova, which is perhaps twenty kilometers from Roccasecca.

His Battle Against Averroism
Averroism is a Medieval school of philosophy that  begun in the late 13th Century, based on the works of the 12th Century Arab philosopher Averroës (Ibn Rushd) and his interpretations of Aristotle and his reconciliation of Aristotelianism with the Islamic faith.
The movement, which can be considered a type of Scholasticism, is sometimes also known as Radical Aristotelianism or Heterodox Aristotelianism. The term "Averroism" itself was coined as late as the 19th Century.
The main ideas of the philosophical concept of Averroism include:
        there is one truth, but there are (at least) two ways to reach it, through philosophy and through religion;
        the world is eternal;
        the soul is divided into two parts, one individual, and one divine;
        the individual soul is not eternal;
        all humans at the basic level share one and the same divine soul (an idea known as monopsychism);
        resurrection of the dead is not possible (this was put forth by Boetius)

St. Thomas’s Education
Monte Cassino
-  Is a Monastic School that is one of the principal conduits of the liberal arts
-        Focuses on the arts of the trivium (grammar, rhetoric, logic) and arts of the quadrivium (arithmetic, geometry, music and astronomy)
-        These constituted the secular education complemented with sacred doctrine as learned from the Bible.
University of Naples
-        His education in the arts continued.
-        Here it would have been impressed upon him that the liberal arts were no longer adequate categories of secular learning: the new translations of Aristotle spelled the end of the liberal arts tradition, although the universities effected a transition rather than a breach.
University of Paris
        His college education began here as the superiors of the Dominican Order sent him here. Paris was then the intellectual center of Christendom.
Studium generale of Dominicans in Cologne
        There he studied from 1248 to 1252 with St. Albert the Great, who was named Doctor Universalis in the Middle Ages because of his wide ranging scholarly interests.
University of Paris
        Aquinas returned to the University of Paris (1252-1256) to complete his theological training.
        The secular masters of the university refused to admit Aquinas, as well as his Franciscan colleague Bonaventure, as a master. Only through papal intervention was their resistance brought to an end.
The Medieval University: An Analysis
        Faculty of Arts provided the point of entry to teen-aged boys. The faculty is modeled on the guilds where the student served a long apprenticeship, established his competence in stages, and eventually after a public examination was named a master and then gave his inaugural lecture.
        With the attainment of the Master of Arts at about the age of 20, one could go on to study in a higher faculty, law, medicine or theology.

St. Thomas’s Writings
        Commentary on the Sentences
        On Being and Essence
        The Principles of Nature
        On the Trinity
        De hebdomadibus
        Summa contra gentiles
        De Anima
        Summa theologiae

Theologian or Philosopher?
Many contemporary philosophers are unsure how to read St. Thomas. He was in his primary and official profession a theologian. Nonetheless, we find among his writings works anyone would recognize as philosophical and the dozen commentaries on Aristotle increasingly enjoy the respect and interest of Aristotelian scholars. Even within theological works as such there are extended discussions that are easily read as possessing a philosophical character.

“… the believer and the philosopher consider creatures differently. The philosopher considers what belongs to their proper natures, while the believer considers only what is true of creatures insofar as they are related to God, for example, that they are created by God and are subject to him, and the like.” (Summa contra gentiles, bk II, chap. 4)
“… it should be noted that different ways of knowing (ratio cognoscibilis) give us different sciences. The astronomer and the natural philosopher both conclude that the earth is round, but the astronomer does this through a mathematical middle that is abstracted from matter, whereas the natural philosopher considers a middle lodged in matter. Thus there is nothing to prevent another science from treating in the light of divine revelation what the philosophical disciplines treat as knowable in the light of human reason.” (Summa theologiae, Ia.1.1 ad 2)

The presuppositions of the philosopher, that to which his discussions and arguments are ultimately driven back, are in the public domain, as it were. They are things that everyone in principle can know upon reflection; they are where disagreement between us must come to an end. These principles are not themselves the products of deductive proof—which does not of course mean that they are immune to rational analysis and inquiry—and thus they are said to be known by themselves (per se, as opposed to per alia).
Theological discourse and inquiry look like any other and is, needless to say, governed by the common principles of thought and being; but it is characterized formally by the fact that its arguments and analyses are taken to be truth-bearing only for one who accepts Scriptural revelation as true.

The Theology of St. Thomas
Faith and reason are the two primary tools which are both necessary in obtaining a true knowledge of God.
He believed that God reveals himself through nature, so that rational thinking and the study of nature is also the study of God (a blend of Aristotelian Greek philosophy with Christian doctrine).
From his consideration of what God is not, Aquinas proposed five positive statements about the divine qualities or the nature of God:
        God is simple, without composition of parts, such as body and soul, or matter and form.
        God is perfect, lacking nothing.
        God is infinite, and not limited in the ways that created beings are physically, intellectually, and emotionally limited.
        God is immutable, incapable of change in respect of essence and character.
        God is one, such that God's essence is the same as God's existence.
Aquinas believed that the existence of God is neither self-evident nor beyond proof. In the Summa Theologica, he details five rational proofs for the existence of God, the quinquae viae or the Five Ways:
        Argument of the unmoved mover (ex motu) -everything that is moved is moved by a mover, therefore there is an unmoved mover from whom all motion proceeds, which is God.
        Argument of the first cause (ex causa) - everything that is caused is caused by something else, therefore there must be an uncaused cause of all caused things, which is God.
        Argument from contingency (ex contingentia) - there are contingent beings in the universe which may either exist or not exist and, as it is impossible for everything in the universe to be contingent (as something cannot come of nothing), so there must be a necessary being whose existence is not contingent on any other being, which is God.
        Argument from degree (ex gradu) - there are various degrees of perfection which may be found throughout the universe, so there must be a pinnacle of perfection from which lesser degrees of perfection derive, which is God.
        Teleological argument (ex fine) - all natural bodies in the world (which are in themselves unintelligent) act towards ends (which is characteristic of intelligence), therefore there must be an intelligent being that guides all natural bodies towards their ends, which is God.
St. Thomas believed that Jesus Christ was truly divine and not simply a human being or God merely inhabiting the body of Christ. However, he held that Christ had a truly rational human soul as well, producing a duality of natures that persisted even after the Incarnation, and that these two natures existed simultaneously yet distinguishably in one real human body.

St. Thomas’ Philosophy
Philosophical thinking is characterized by its argumentative structure and a science is taken to be principally the discovery of the properties of kinds of things.

Like Aristotle, St. Thomas holds that there is a plurality of both theoretical and practical sciences.
        The practical use of the mind has as its object the guidance of some activity other than thinking.
e.g. Ethics, economics and politics
        The theoretical use of the mind has truth as its object. It seeks not to change the world but to understand it.
e.g. physics, mathematics and metaphysics

Another way to philosophical inquiry has something to do with the appropriate order in which it should be studied. That order of learning is as follows:
  1. Logic. The primacy of logic in this order stems from the fact that we have to know what knowledge is so we will recognize that we have met its demands in a particular case.
  2. Mathematics. The study of mathematics comes early because little experience of the world is required to master it.
  3. Natural philosophy. Knowledge of the physical world requires an ever increasing dependence upon a wide and deep experience of things.
  4. Moral philosophy. This requires not only experience, but good upbringing and the ordering of the passions.
  5. Metaphysics. Speculative wisdom is the culminating and defining goal of philosophical inquiry: it is such knowledge as we can achieve of the divine, the first cause of all else.

St. Thomas and Education
For Aquinas, teaching is connected with the Divine, since he argues that though human beings are able to teach, they do so in a secondary sense and that it is God who primarily teaches. This is because God is the source of all being and is the light at the heart of our being.

In the learning process, a key feature of Aquinas’s account builds on the nature of illumination, which is to say an understanding of what is taught that enables us to see how what we have learnt connects to other things.
Ultimately, these connections lead us to Wisdom, which is to say God, and for Aquinas wisdom in its different forms is the central aim of all teaching and learning.

Although Aquinas does not develop a treatise on teaching and learning, he spent a considerable amount of his time teaching and throughout his writings there are references to teaching and to learning.
He deals explicitly with teaching and learning in a number of his works:
        De Veritate , question 11;
        Summa Theologica , prima pars , question 117
        II Sentences, questions 9 and 28

“Education has, and hence teaching and learning have, an unambiguous theological goal, namely, God, who is wisdom and truth.”

“The ultimate end of the whole universe is Truth and this is also the aim of the wise.”

Recognition of the teacher as a role model for the pupil
Love and enthusiasm for the subject, while crucial to teaching, are not enough; the teacher must also genuinely care for the truth and be committed to possessing a mastery of his or her subject.
Faith is required not just for religious belief, but for scientific understanding as well, for as Aquinas says, we could not live in the world at all unless we are prepared to have faith.
       The emphasis on trust and faith in teaching and learning in particular highlights the importance of the relationship between the teacher and the learner.
Teacher and learner are both engaged in a voyage of discovery for the truth.
       A poor or distant relationship will not facilitate learning, since it will not promote the trust required for the pupil to have confidence in the teacher.

Passages from Aquinas:

“Man can truly be called a true teacher in as much as he teaches the truth and enlightens the mind. This does not mean, however, that he endows the mind with light, but that, as it were, he co-operates with the light of reason by supplying external help to it to reach the perfection of knowledge.
                                                 – Quaestiones De Veritate, 11
“Man, teaching from without, does not infuse the intelligible light, but he is in a certain sense a cause of the intelligible species, in so far as he offers us certain signs of intelligible likenesses, which our understanding receives from those signs and keeps within itself.
                                                 – Quaestiones De Veritate, 11
“Knowledge, therefore, pre-exists in the learner potentially, not, however, in the purely passive, but in the active, sense. Otherwise, man would not be able to acquire knowledge independently. Therefore, as there are two ways of being cured, that is, either through the activity of unaided nature or by nature with the aid of medicine, so also there are two ways of acquiring knowledge. In one way, natural reason by itself reaches knowledge of unknown things, and this way is called discovery; in the other way, when someone else aids the learner’s natural reason, and this is called learning by instruction.”
                                                             – Quaestiones De Veritate, 11